You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A phase II randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study of salvage radiation therapy plus placebo versus SRT plus enzalutamide with high-risk PSA-recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (SALV-ENZA)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-019-5805-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roche Kapoor, Matthew P. Deek, Riley McIntyre, Natasha Raman, Megan Kummerlowe, Iyah Chen, Matt Gaver, Hao Wang, Sam Denmeade, Tamara Lotan, Channing Paller, Mark Markowski, Michael Carducci, Mario Eisenberger, Tomasz M. Beer, Daniel Y. Song, Theodore L. DeWeese, Jason W. Hearn, Stephen Greco, Curtiland DeVille, Neil B. Desai, Elisabeth I. Heath, Stanley Liauw, Daniel E. Spratt, Arthur Y. Hung, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Phuoc T. Tran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 23% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 31% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,684,243
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,480
of 8,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,891
of 353,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#149
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,403 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.