↓ Skip to main content

Airborne Waveform Lidar Simulator Using the Radiative Transfer of a Laser Pulse

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Sciences, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Airborne Waveform Lidar Simulator Using the Radiative Transfer of a Laser Pulse
Published in
Applied Sciences, June 2019
DOI 10.3390/app9122452
Authors

Minsu Kim

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,055,351
of 13,555,081 outputs
Outputs from Applied Sciences
#172
of 1,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,965
of 249,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Sciences
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,555,081 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,820 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.