↓ Skip to main content

Health Care Support Issues for Internationally Adopted Children: A Qualitative Approach to the Needs and Expectations of Families

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health Care Support Issues for Internationally Adopted Children: A Qualitative Approach to the Needs and Expectations of Families
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0031313
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivier Lesens, Anna Schmidt, Florence De Rancourt, Véronique Poirier, André Labbe, Henri Laurichesse, Laurent Marty, Jean Beytout, Philippe Vorilhon

Abstract

Families of internationally adopted children may face specific problems with which general practitioners (GPs) may not be familiar. The aim of the study was to explore problems faced by families before, during and after the arrival of their internationally adopted child and to assess the usefulness of a specific medical structure for internationally adopted children, which could be a resource for the GP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 26%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Psychology 6 16%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2012.
All research outputs
#14,724,943
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#122,852
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,676
of 156,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,018
of 3,533 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,533 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.