↓ Skip to main content

Thermal constraints on in vivo optogenetic manipulations

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
163 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
309 Mendeley
Title
Thermal constraints on in vivo optogenetic manipulations
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, June 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41593-019-0422-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott F. Owen, Max H. Liu, Anatol C. Kreitzer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 163 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 309 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 29%
Researcher 56 18%
Student > Bachelor 35 11%
Student > Master 31 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 38 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 136 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 18%
Engineering 18 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 4%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 45 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2020.
All research outputs
#185,774
of 14,386,406 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#476
of 4,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,024
of 257,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#18
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,386,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.