↓ Skip to main content

Global conservation priorities for crop wild relatives

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Plants, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 472)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
119 tweeters
facebook
15 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Global conservation priorities for crop wild relatives
Published in
Nature Plants, March 2016
DOI 10.1038/nplants.2016.22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nora P. Castañeda-Álvarez, Harold A. Achicanoy, Vivian Bernau, Hannes Dempewolf, Ruth J. Eastwood, Luigi Guarino, Ruth H. Harker, Andy Jarvis, Nigel Maxted, Jonas V. Müller, Julian Ramirez-Villegas, Chrystian C. Sosa, Paul C. Struik, Holly Vincent, Jane Toll, Colin K. Khoury, Castañeda Alvarez, Nora Patricia, Khoury, Colin K., Achicanoy, Harold, Bernau, Vivian, Dempewolf, Hannes, Eastwood, Ruth J., Guarino, Luigi, Harker, Ruth H., Jarvis, Andy, Maxted, Nigel, Müller, Jonas V., Ramirez-Villegas, Julian, Sosa, Chrystian, Struik, Paul C., Vincent, Holly, Toll, Jane, Castañeda-Álvarez, Nora P, Khoury, Colin K, Achicanoy, Harold A, Eastwood, Ruth J, Harker, Ruth H, Müller, Jonas V, Sosa, Chrystian C, Struik, Paul C

Abstract

The wild relatives of domesticated crops possess genetic diversity useful for developing more productive, nutritious and resilient crop varieties. However, their conservation status and availability for utilization are a concern, and have not been quantified globally. Here, we model the global distribution of 1,076 taxa related to 81 crops, using occurrence information collected from biodiversity, herbarium and gene bank databases. We compare the potential geographic and ecological diversity encompassed in these distributions with that currently accessible in gene banks, as a means to estimate the comprehensiveness of the conservation of genetic diversity. Our results indicate that the diversity of crop wild relatives is poorly represented in gene banks. For 313 (29.1% of total) taxa associated with 63 crops, no germplasm accessions exist, and a further 257 (23.9%) are represented by fewer than ten accessions. Over 70% of taxa are identified as high priority for further collecting in order to improve their representation in gene banks, and over 95% are insufficiently represented in regard to the full range of geographic and ecological variation in their native distributions. The most critical collecting gaps occur in the Mediterranean and the Near East, western and southern Europe, Southeast and East Asia, and South America. We conclude that a systematic effort is needed to improve the conservation and availability of crop wild relatives for use in plant breeding.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
Colombia 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 97 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 29%
Researcher 28 25%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 6 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 66%
Environmental Science 17 15%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 10 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 296. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2017.
All research outputs
#18,408
of 7,912,452 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
#11
of 472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,552
of 281,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
#2
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,912,452 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.