↓ Skip to main content

Global conservation priorities for crop wild relatives

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Plants, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 658)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

20 news outlets
6 blogs
122 tweeters
15 Facebook pages
2 Wikipedia pages
2 Google+ users

Readers on

146 Mendeley
1 CiteULike
Global conservation priorities for crop wild relatives
Published in
Nature Plants, March 2016
DOI 10.1038/nplants.2016.22
Pubmed ID

Nora P. Castañeda-Álvarez, Harold A. Achicanoy, Vivian Bernau, Hannes Dempewolf, Ruth J. Eastwood, Luigi Guarino, Ruth H. Harker, Andy Jarvis, Nigel Maxted, Jonas V. Müller, Julian Ramirez-Villegas, Chrystian C. Sosa, Paul C. Struik, Holly Vincent, Jane Toll, Colin K. Khoury, Castañeda Alvarez, Nora Patricia, Khoury, Colin K., Achicanoy, Harold, Bernau, Vivian, Dempewolf, Hannes, Eastwood, Ruth J., Guarino, Luigi, Harker, Ruth H., Jarvis, Andy, Maxted, Nigel, Müller, Jonas V., Ramirez-Villegas, Julian, Sosa, Chrystian, Struik, Paul C., Vincent, Holly, Toll, Jane, Castañeda-Álvarez, Nora P, Khoury, Colin K, Achicanoy, Harold A, Eastwood, Ruth J, Harker, Ruth H, Müller, Jonas V, Sosa, Chrystian C, Struik, Paul C, Castañeda-Álvarez, Nora P., Achicanoy, Harold A., Sosa, Chrystian C.


The wild relatives of domesticated crops possess genetic diversity useful for developing more productive, nutritious and resilient crop varieties. However, their conservation status and availability for utilization are a concern, and have not been quantified globally. Here, we model the global distribution of 1,076 taxa related to 81 crops, using occurrence information collected from biodiversity, herbarium and gene bank databases. We compare the potential geographic and ecological diversity encompassed in these distributions with that currently accessible in gene banks, as a means to estimate the comprehensiveness of the conservation of genetic diversity. Our results indicate that the diversity of crop wild relatives is poorly represented in gene banks. For 313 (29.1% of total) taxa associated with 63 crops, no germplasm accessions exist, and a further 257 (23.9%) are represented by fewer than ten accessions. Over 70% of taxa are identified as high priority for further collecting in order to improve their representation in gene banks, and over 95% are insufficiently represented in regard to the full range of geographic and ecological variation in their native distributions. The most critical collecting gaps occur in the Mediterranean and the Near East, western and southern Europe, Southeast and East Asia, and South America. We conclude that a systematic effort is needed to improve the conservation and availability of crop wild relatives for use in plant breeding.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 122 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Mexico 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Colombia 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 127 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 29%
Researcher 36 25%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 8%
Other 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 71%
Environmental Science 20 14%
Unspecified 9 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 5 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 296. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2017.
All research outputs
of 11,016,172 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
of 658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 287,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,016,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.