↓ Skip to main content

Advance misoprostol distribution for preventing and treating postpartum haemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advance misoprostol distribution for preventing and treating postpartum haemorrhage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009336.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olufemi T Oladapo, Bukola Fawole, Jennifer Blum, Edgardo Abalos

Abstract

Advance community distribution of misoprostol for preventing or treating postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) has become an attractive strategy to expand uterotonic coverage to places where conventional uterotonic use is not feasible. However, the value and safety of this strategy remain contentious.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 20%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Unspecified 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 13 12%
Other 33 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 43%
Unspecified 16 14%
Social Sciences 13 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Other 12 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2012.
All research outputs
#6,788,855
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,061
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,522
of 116,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.