↓ Skip to main content

教育社会学における言説研究の動向と課題

Overview of attention for article published in Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 102)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
教育社会学における言説研究の動向と課題
Published in
Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu, November 2017
DOI 10.11151/eds.101.153

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,764,601
of 13,477,663 outputs
Outputs from Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu
#44
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,000
of 245,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,477,663 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them