↓ Skip to main content

A 'snip' in time: what is the best age to circumcise?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 3,469)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
109 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A 'snip' in time: what is the best age to circumcise?
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-12-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian J Morris, Jake H Waskett, Joya Banerjee, Richard G Wamai, Aaron AR Tobian, Ronald H Gray, Stefan A Bailis, Robert C Bailey, Jeffrey D Klausner, Robin J Willcourt, Daniel T Halperin, Thomas E Wiswell, Adrian Mindel

Abstract

Circumcision is a common procedure, but regional and societal attitudes differ on whether there is a need for a male to be circumcised and, if so, at what age. This is an important issue for many parents, but also pediatricians, other doctors, policy makers, public health authorities, medical bodies, and males themselves.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 195 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 15%
Student > Master 29 14%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 52 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Social Sciences 16 8%
Psychology 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 61 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#325,069
of 25,515,042 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#25
of 3,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,371
of 168,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,515,042 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.