↓ Skip to main content

Historical Legacies in World Amphibian Diversity Revealed by the Turnover and Nestedness Components of Beta Diversity

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Historical Legacies in World Amphibian Diversity Revealed by the Turnover and Nestedness Components of Beta Diversity
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032341
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrés Baselga, Carola Gómez-Rodríguez, Jorge M. Lobo

Abstract

Historic processes are expected to influence present diversity patterns in combination with contemporary environmental factors. We hypothesise that the joint use of beta diversity partitioning methods and a threshold-based approach may help reveal the effect of large-scale historic processes on present biodiversity. We partitioned intra-regional beta diversity into its turnover (differences in composition caused by species replacements) and nestedness-resultant (differences in species composition caused by species losses) components. We used piecewise regressions to show that, for amphibian beta diversity, two different world regions can be distinguished. Below parallel 37, beta diversity is dominated by turnover, while above parallel 37, beta diversity is dominated by nestedness. Notably, these regions are revealed when the piecewise regression method is applied to the relationship between latitude and the difference between the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and the present temperature but not when present energy-water factors are analysed. When this threshold effect of historic climatic change is partialled out, current energy-water variables become more relevant to the nestedness-resultant dissimilarity patterns, while mountainous areas are associated with higher spatial turnover. This result suggests that nested patterns are caused by species losses that are determined by physiological constraints, whereas turnover is associated with speciation and/or Pleistocene refugia. Thus, the new threshold-based view may help reveal the role of historic factors in shaping present amphibian beta diversity patterns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 17 5%
Germany 5 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 311 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 21%
Researcher 63 18%
Student > Master 59 17%
Student > Bachelor 30 9%
Student > Postgraduate 25 7%
Other 66 19%
Unknown 33 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 200 57%
Environmental Science 76 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 2%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Other 12 3%
Unknown 45 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,272
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#129,810
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,271
of 156,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,124
of 3,531 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,531 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.