↓ Skip to main content

National mycology laboratory diagnostic capacity for invasive fungal diseases in 2017: Evidence of sub-optimal practice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Infection, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
National mycology laboratory diagnostic capacity for invasive fungal diseases in 2017: Evidence of sub-optimal practice
Published in
Journal of Infection, August 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.06.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silke Schelenz, Katie Owens, Rebecca Guy, Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Rohini J. Manuel, Malcolm Richardson, Caroline Moore, David A. Enoch, Christianne Micallef, Philip Howard, Samir G. Agrawal, Elizabeth M. Johnson, Berit Muller-Pebody

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 14%
Other 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 4 29%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 43%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,762,585
of 14,155,626 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infection
#149
of 1,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,898
of 256,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infection
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,155,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,490 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.