↓ Skip to main content

National mycology laboratory diagnostic capacity for invasive fungal diseases in 2017: Evidence of sub-optimal practice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Infection, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
National mycology laboratory diagnostic capacity for invasive fungal diseases in 2017: Evidence of sub-optimal practice
Published in
Journal of Infection, August 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.06.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silke Schelenz, Katie Owens, Rebecca Guy, Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Rohini J. Manuel, Malcolm Richardson, Caroline Moore, David A. Enoch, Christianne Micallef, Philip Howard, Samir G. Agrawal, Elizabeth M. Johnson, Berit Muller-Pebody

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Other 2 18%
Unspecified 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 45%
Unspecified 2 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 9%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,477,386
of 13,647,261 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infection
#121
of 1,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,510
of 250,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infection
#8
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,647,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,451 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.