You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Sequential correction technique to avoid postoperative global coronal decompensation in rigid adult spinal deformity: a technical note and preliminary results
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Spine Journal, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00586-019-06043-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hongda Bao, Zhen Liu, Yuancheng Zhang, Xu Sun, Jun Jiang, Bangping Qian, Saihu Mao, Yong Qiu, Zezhang Zhu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
Spain | 1 | 10% |
Brazil | 1 | 10% |
France | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#5,823,607
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#664
of 4,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,778
of 350,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#26
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,700 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.