↓ Skip to main content

An Evaluation of Internet Versus Paper‐based Methods for Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS)

Overview of attention for article published in Transactions in GIS, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Evaluation of Internet Versus Paper‐based Methods for Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS)
Published in
Transactions in GIS, February 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2011.01287.x
Authors

Pocewicz, Amy, Nielsen‐Pincus, Max, Brown, Greg, Schnitzer, Russ, Amy Pocewicz, Max Nielsen-Pincus, Greg Brown, Russ Schnitzer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
Portugal 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 82 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 28%
Student > Master 24 26%
Researcher 12 13%
Unspecified 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 19 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 25 27%
Social Sciences 18 20%
Computer Science 15 16%
Unspecified 11 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 11%
Other 13 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2012.
All research outputs
#1,341,587
of 6,386,016 outputs
Outputs from Transactions in GIS
#14
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,030
of 84,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions in GIS
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,386,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them