↓ Skip to main content

Consequences of Tit‐for‐Tat Enforcement: Toward a Hippocratic Principle of Regulatory Implementation

Overview of attention for article published in Law & Policy, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consequences of Tit‐for‐Tat Enforcement: Toward a Hippocratic Principle of Regulatory Implementation
Published in
Law & Policy, April 2019
DOI 10.1111/lapo.12125
Authors

Stig S. Gezelius

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#12,185,206
of 15,329,269 outputs
Outputs from Law & Policy
#157
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,578
of 262,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Law & Policy
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,329,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.