You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Spatial conservation planning under uncertainty: adapting to climate change risks using modern portfolio theory
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecological Applications, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/eap.1962 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mitchell J. Eaton, Simeon Yurek, Zulqarnain Haider, Julien Martin, Fred A. Johnson, Bradley J. Udell, Hadi Charkhgard, Changhyun Kwon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 43% |
Canada | 1 | 7% |
Australia | 1 | 7% |
France | 1 | 7% |
Colombia | 1 | 7% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
Scientists | 5 | 36% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 18% |
Researcher | 18 | 15% |
Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Unknown | 39 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 18 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 13% |
Engineering | 10 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 48 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,156,190
of 25,301,208 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#584
of 3,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,535
of 352,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#18
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,301,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.