You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What is the impact of user affect on motor learning in virtual environments after stroke? A scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-019-0546-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nina Rohrbach, Emily Chicklis, Danielle Elaine Levac |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 45% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 77 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 9% |
| Engineering | 14 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 7% |
| Psychology | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 21% |
| Unknown | 82 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,721,790
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#205
of 1,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,838
of 350,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#12
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.