↓ Skip to main content

Blue Whales Respond to Anthropogenic Noise

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blue Whales Respond to Anthropogenic Noise
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032681
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariana L. Melcón, Amanda J. Cummins, Sara M. Kerosky, Lauren K. Roche, Sean M. Wiggins, John A. Hildebrand

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise may significantly impact exposed marine mammals. This work studied the vocalization response of endangered blue whales to anthropogenic noise sources in the mid-frequency range using passive acoustic monitoring in the Southern California Bight. Blue whales were less likely to produce calls when mid-frequency active sonar was present. This reduction was more pronounced when the sonar source was closer to the animal, at higher sound levels. The animals were equally likely to stop calling at any time of day, showing no diel pattern in their sensitivity to sonar. Conversely, the likelihood of whales emitting calls increased when ship sounds were nearby. Whales did not show a differential response to ship noise as a function of the time of the day either. These results demonstrate that anthropogenic noise, even at frequencies well above the blue whales' sound production range, has a strong probability of eliciting changes in vocal behavior. The long-term implications of disruption in call production to blue whale foraging and other behaviors are currently not well understood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
French Guiana 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 325 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 68 20%
Researcher 66 19%
Student > Master 52 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 13%
Other 20 6%
Other 38 11%
Unknown 55 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 161 47%
Environmental Science 70 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Engineering 8 2%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 64 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#729,664
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,692
of 225,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,216
of 168,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#124
of 3,533 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,533 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.