↓ Skip to main content

Banked preterm versus banked term human milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
38 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Banked preterm versus banked term human milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007644.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene Dempsey, Jan Miletin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 81 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 31%
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Other 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Unspecified 8 9%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 10 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#534,677
of 13,612,446 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,620
of 10,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,671
of 248,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,612,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.