↓ Skip to main content

Dilute versus full-strength formula in exclusively formula-fed preterm or low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dilute versus full-strength formula in exclusively formula-fed preterm or low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007263.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fauziah Basuki, Diah R Hadiati, Tari Turner, Steve McDonald, Mohammad Hakimi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Ethiopia 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 68 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Unspecified 7 10%
Other 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Unspecified 10 14%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#887,522
of 13,610,796 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,743
of 10,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,695
of 249,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,610,796 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.