You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dilute versus full‐strength formula in exclusively formula‐fed preterm or low birth weight infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007263.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fauziah Basuki, Diah R Hadiati, Tari Turner, Steve McDonald, Mohammad Hakimi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 33% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 7% |
| Honduras | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 94 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 106 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,965,014
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,082
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,783
of 367,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.