↓ Skip to main content

Frequency and factors influencing publication of abstracts presented at three major nephrology meetings

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Medicine, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Frequency and factors influencing publication of abstracts presented at three major nephrology meetings
Published in
International Archives of Medicine, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1755-7682-4-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ziv Harel, Ron Wald, Ari Juda, Chaim M Bell

Abstract

There have been no contemporary studies assessing abstract publication rates and the factors associated with full publication within the field of nephrology. As such, it is unclear whether a publication bias exists for abstracts presented at nephrology meetings, which may hinder the dissemination of potentially important results. Our objective was to review a selection of abstracts presented at 3 major nephrology meetings to determine the proportion that reach full publication and factors associated with full publication.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 29%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Unspecified 2 29%
Psychology 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2012.
All research outputs
#3,108,266
of 4,505,992 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Medicine
#53
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,351
of 77,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Medicine
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.