↓ Skip to main content

Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics in congestive heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics in congestive heart failure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003178.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Raymund K. Salvador, Felix Eduardo Punzalan, Nannette R Rey, Margaret Ruth Bernado, Mary Dawn Nablo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 127 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Master 15 11%
Other 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Other 46 34%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 19 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2019.
All research outputs
#12,215,823
of 15,371,078 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,238
of 11,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,191
of 262,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,371,078 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.