You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015
|
---|---|
Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4 |
ISBNs |
978-3-31-924573-7, 978-3-31-924574-4
|
Authors |
Nassir Navab, Joachim Hornegger, William M. Wells, Alejandro F. Frangi |
Editors |
Nassir Navab, Joachim Hornegger, William M. Wells, Alejandro F. Frangi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 25% |
United States | 5 | 21% |
Germany | 3 | 13% |
Slovenia | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 79% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 206 | 18% |
Student > Master | 172 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 113 | 10% |
Researcher | 91 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 47 | 4% |
Other | 106 | 9% |
Unknown | 426 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 272 | 23% |
Engineering | 222 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 24 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 2% |
Other | 121 | 10% |
Unknown | 461 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#422,529
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#39
of 8,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,930
of 365,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#1
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.