You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Negative- versus positive-pressure ventilation in intubated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc11216 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Konstantinos Raymondos, Ulrich Molitoris, Marcus Capewell, Björn Sander, Thorben Dieck, Jörg Ahrens, Christian Weilbach, Wolfgang Knitsch, Antonio Corrado |
| Abstract |
Recent experimental data suggest that continuous external negative-pressure ventilation (CENPV) results in better oxygenation and less lung injury than continuous positive-pressure ventilation (CPPV). The effects of CENPV on patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remain unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 55% |
| Engineering | 9 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,401,401
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,099
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,789
of 168,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#10
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.