You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment of California's At-Risk Birds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0029507 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Gardali, Nathaniel E. Seavy, Ryan T. DiGaudio, Lyann A. Comrack |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 82% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 323 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 107 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 14% |
| Unknown | 47 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 162 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 94 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 4% |
| Unknown | 52 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2013.
All research outputs
#2,279,043
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#27,666
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,828
of 170,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#403
of 3,598 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,598 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.