You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implicit Bias in Surgery—Hiding in Plain Sight
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6535 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fahima Dossa, Nancy N. Baxter |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 22% |
| Australia | 14 | 19% |
| Canada | 5 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 32% |
| Scientists | 16 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 4 | 18% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#302,519
of 24,532,617 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#1,938
of 8,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,268
of 352,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#64
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,532,617 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 130.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.