↓ Skip to main content

Implicit Bias in Surgery—Hiding in Plain Sight

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Network Open, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
87 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Implicit Bias in Surgery—Hiding in Plain Sight
Published in
JAMA Network Open, July 2019
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6535
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fahima Dossa, Nancy N. Baxter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 40%
Researcher 2 20%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 60%
Unknown 4 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#151,607
of 16,651,613 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#472
of 2,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,879
of 266,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#35
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,651,613 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.