↓ Skip to main content

The Myth of Flexible Universality: Human Rights and the Limits of Comparative Naturalism

Overview of attention for article published in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Myth of Flexible Universality: Human Rights and the Limits of Comparative Naturalism
Published in
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, July 2019
DOI 10.1093/ojls/gqz019
Authors

Eric Heinze

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 50%
Professor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,901,038
of 13,603,158 outputs
Outputs from Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
#87
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,754
of 248,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,603,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.