↓ Skip to main content

Efficient and Exact Sampling of Simple Graphs with Given Arbitrary Degree Sequence

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficient and Exact Sampling of Simple Graphs with Given Arbitrary Degree Sequence
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charo I. Del Genio, Hyunju Kim, Zoltán Toroczkai, Kevin E. Bassler

Abstract

Uniform sampling from graphical realizations of a given degree sequence is a fundamental component in simulation-based measurements of network observables, with applications ranging from epidemics, through social networks to Internet modeling. Existing graph sampling methods are either link-swap based (Markov-Chain Monte Carlo algorithms) or stub-matching based (the Configuration Model). Both types are ill-controlled, with typically unknown mixing times for link-swap methods and uncontrolled rejections for the Configuration Model. Here we propose an efficient, polynomial time algorithm that generates statistically independent graph samples with a given, arbitrary, degree sequence. The algorithm provides a weight associated with each sample, allowing the observable to be measured either uniformly over the graph ensemble, or, alternatively, with a desired distribution. Unlike other algorithms, this method always produces a sample, without back-tracking or rejections. Using a central limit theorem-based reasoning, we argue, that for large , and for degree sequences admitting many realizations, the sample weights are expected to have a lognormal distribution. As examples, we apply our algorithm to generate networks with degree sequences drawn from power-law distributions and from binomial distributions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
Italy 3 3%
Germany 3 3%
China 2 2%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 102 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 36%
Researcher 30 25%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Professor 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 3 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 31 26%
Physics and Astronomy 25 21%
Mathematics 19 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Engineering 8 7%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 12 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,911,493
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,358
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,492
of 94,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#335
of 682 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 682 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.