You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health-Related Financial Catastrophe, Inequality and Chronic Illness in Bangladesh
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0056873 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mizanur Rahman, Stuart Gilmour, Eiko Saito, Papia Sultana, Kenji Shibuya |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 202 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 17% |
| Researcher | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 53 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 38 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 66 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,594,277
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#91,650
of 197,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,002
of 194,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,119
of 5,368 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,368 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.