You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Decision Support to Promote Safe Prescribing to Women of Reproductive Age: A Cluster-Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-012-1991-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleanor Bimla Schwarz, Sara M. Parisi, Steven M. Handler, Gideon Koren, Elan D. Cohen, Grant J. Shevchik, Gary S. Fischer |
| Abstract |
Potentially teratogenic medications are frequently prescribed without provision of contraceptive counseling. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,406,676
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,998
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,095
of 253,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#24
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.