You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Incidence of Respiratory Virus-Associated Pneumonia in Urban Poor Young Children of Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2009–2011
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0032056 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nusrat Homaira, Stephen P. Luby, William A. Petri, Raija Vainionpaa, Mustafizur Rahman, Kamal Hossain, Cynthia B. Snider, Mahmudur Rahman, A. S. M. Alamgir, Farzina Zesmin, Masud Alam, Emily S. Gurley, Rashid Uz Zaman, Tasnim Azim, Dean D. Erdman, Alicia M. Fry, Joseph Bresee, Marc-Alain Widdowson, Rashidul Haque, Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner |
| Abstract |
Pneumonia is the leading cause of childhood death in Bangladesh. We conducted a longitudinal study to estimate the incidence of virus-associated pneumonia in children aged <2 years in a low-income urban community in Dhaka, Bangladesh. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 50% |
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,154,894
of 24,849,927 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#51,368
of 215,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,303
of 161,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#709
of 3,520 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,849,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,520 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.