↓ Skip to main content

Can linear transportation infrastructure verges constitute a habitat and/or a corridor for biodiversity in temperate landscapes? A systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can linear transportation infrastructure verges constitute a habitat and/or a corridor for biodiversity in temperate landscapes? A systematic review protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13750-016-0056-9
Authors

Arzhvaël Jeusset, Marianne Vargac, Yves Bertheau, Aurélie Coulon, Nadine Deniaud, Frédérique Flamerie De Lachapelle, Emmanuel Jaslier, Barbara Livoreil, Véronique Roy, Julien Touroult, Sylvie Vanpeene, Isabelle Witté, Romain Sordello

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 29%
Student > Master 9 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Unspecified 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 50%
Environmental Science 10 24%
Unspecified 5 12%
Engineering 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,144,642
of 11,411,632 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#113
of 139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,187
of 285,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,411,632 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.