↓ Skip to main content

Oral Mucositis Induced By Anticancer Therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Current Oral Health Reports, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral Mucositis Induced By Anticancer Therapies
Published in
Current Oral Health Reports, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40496-015-0069-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sali Al-Ansari, Judith A. E. M. Zecha, Andrei Barasch, Jan de Lange, Fred R. Rozema, Judith E. Raber-Durlacher

Abstract

Oral mucositis induced by conventional cytotoxic cancer therapies is a common and significant clinical problem in oncology. Mucositis symptoms, which include severe pain, may lead to dose reductions and unplanned interruptions of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and often affect patients' quality of life. In addition, ulcerative mucositis represents a risk factor for local or systemic infectious complications that may be life-threatening in immunosuppressed patients. The development of biologically based targeted cancer therapies, which aim to block the growth, spread, and survival of tumors by interfering with specific molecular targets, may have reduced mucosal injury, but did not eliminate it. This article will review the epidemiology, pathobiology, and management of oral mucositis associated with conventional cytotoxic therapies for malignant diseases and will briefly summarize emerging information on oral mucosal injury associated with targeted therapies. Considerations for future research aimed at the development of more efficient and effective supportive care approaches will be presented, with emphasis on the contribution of dental researchers and clinicians in these efforts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 215 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 18%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Other 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Other 47 22%
Unknown 61 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 66 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,529,200
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Current Oral Health Reports
#10
of 78 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,022
of 283,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Oral Health Reports
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them