↓ Skip to main content

Automated decision-making in the EU Member States: The right to explanation and other “suitable safeguards” in the national legislations

Overview of attention for article published in Computer Law & Security Review, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 367)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
85 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automated decision-making in the EU Member States: The right to explanation and other “suitable safeguards” in the national legislations
Published in
Computer Law & Security Review, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2019.05.002
Authors

Gianclaudio Malgieri

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 7 8%
Professor 6 7%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 27%
Computer Science 17 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 8%
Engineering 5 6%
Arts and Humanities 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 16 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2020.
All research outputs
#446,684
of 17,663,872 outputs
Outputs from Computer Law & Security Review
#6
of 367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,475
of 269,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Law & Security Review
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,663,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them