You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of the health and well-being impacts of school gardening: synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-016-2941-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heather Ohly, Sarah Gentry, Rachel Wigglesworth, Alison Bethel, Rebecca Lovell, Ruth Garside |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 47 | 52% |
| Canada | 5 | 6% |
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 63% |
| Scientists | 18 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 465 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 461 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 79 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 10% |
| Researcher | 45 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 89 | 19% |
| Unknown | 124 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 64 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 12% |
| Psychology | 46 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 85 | 18% |
| Unknown | 148 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#498,515
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#467
of 17,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,153
of 314,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#10
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.