You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
First cycad seedling foliage from the fossil record and inferences for the Cenozoic evolution of cycads
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology Letters, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0114 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Boglárka Erdei, Mario Coiro, Ian Miller, Kirk R. Johnson, M. Patrick Griffith, Vickie Murphy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Thailand | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 68% |
| Scientists | 12 | 32% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 33% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,270,247
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#1,112
of 3,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,822
of 361,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#18
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.