↓ Skip to main content

Classifying RNA-Binding Proteins Based on Electrostatic Properties

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Classifying RNA-Binding Proteins Based on Electrostatic Properties
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shula Shazman, Yael Mandel-Gutfreund

Abstract

Protein structure can provide new insight into the biological function of a protein and can enable the design of better experiments to learn its biological roles. Moreover, deciphering the interactions of a protein with other molecules can contribute to the understanding of the protein's function within cellular processes. In this study, we apply a machine learning approach for classifying RNA-binding proteins based on their three-dimensional structures. The method is based on characterizing unique properties of electrostatic patches on the protein surface. Using an ensemble of general protein features and specific properties extracted from the electrostatic patches, we have trained a support vector machine (SVM) to distinguish RNA-binding proteins from other positively charged proteins that do not bind nucleic acids. Specifically, the method was applied on proteins possessing the RNA recognition motif (RRM) and successfully classified RNA-binding proteins from RRM domains involved in protein-protein interactions. Overall the method achieves 88% accuracy in classifying RNA-binding proteins, yet it cannot distinguish RNA from DNA binding proteins. Nevertheless, by applying a multiclass SVM approach we were able to classify the RNA-binding proteins based on their RNA targets, specifically, whether they bind a ribosomal RNA (rRNA), a transfer RNA (tRNA), or messenger RNA (mRNA). Finally, we present here an innovative approach that does not rely on sequence or structural homology and could be applied to identify novel RNA-binding proteins with unique folds and/or binding motifs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 7%
United Kingdom 4 3%
Japan 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 119 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 34%
Researcher 30 22%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 7%
Student > Master 10 7%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 21%
Computer Science 11 8%
Chemistry 7 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 14 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7,479
of 8,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,839
of 99,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#30
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.