You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effect of a complementary e-learning course on implementation of a quality improvement project regarding care for elderly patients: a stepped wedge trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lotte Van de Steeg, Maaike Langelaan, Roelie Ijkema, Cordula Wagner |
Abstract |
Delirium occurs frequently in elderly hospitalised patients and is associated with higher mortality, increased length of hospital stay, functional decline, and admission to long-term care. Healthcare professionals frequently do not recognise delirium, indicating that education can play an important role in improving delirium care for hospitalised elderly. Previous studies have indicated that e-learning can provide an effective way of educating healthcare professionals and improving quality of care, though results are inconsistent. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Italy | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 173 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
Researcher | 26 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
Other | 40 | 22% |
Unknown | 44 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 17 | 9% |
Psychology | 12 | 7% |
Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 8% |
Unknown | 48 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2012.
All research outputs
#13,360,185
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,408
of 1,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,603
of 156,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#20
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.