↓ Skip to main content

Xuebijing for paraquat poisoning

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Xuebijing for paraquat poisoning
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010109.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Deng, Dongmei Huo, Qiaoyuan Wu, Lin Zhu, Yunhua Liao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Psychology 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 15 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2020.
All research outputs
#10,209,448
of 18,068,324 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,444
of 11,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,778
of 271,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,068,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.