↓ Skip to main content

Meta-Analysis of Two Genome-Wide Association Studies of Bovine Paratuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meta-Analysis of Two Genome-Wide Association Studies of Bovine Paratuberculosis
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032578
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giulietta Minozzi, John L. Williams, Alessandra Stella, Francesco Strozzi, Mario Luini, Matthew L. Settles, Jeremy F. Taylor, Robert H. Whitlock, Ricardo Zanella, Holly L. Neibergs

Abstract

Bovine paratuberculosis (ParaTB) also known as Johne's disease, is a contagious fatal disease resulting from infection by Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP). Previous studies have identified loci associated with ParaTB using different measurements to define cases and controls. The objective of this study was to combine the data from two recent studies to identify genetic loci associated with MAP tissue infection and humoral immune response, defined by MAP ELISA-positive cattle, by comparing cases and control animals for one or both measures of infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 71 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 41%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,272
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#129,810
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,955
of 156,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,189
of 3,602 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,602 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.