↓ Skip to main content

Effect of filling technique on the bond strength of methacrylate and silorane-based composite restorations

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Oral Research, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of filling technique on the bond strength of methacrylate and silorane-based composite restorations
Published in
Brazilian Oral Research, January 2016
DOI 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2016.vol30.0044
Pubmed ID
Authors

MACHADO, Fernanda Weingartner, BORGES, Fernanda Blos, CENCI, Maximiliano Sérgio, MORAES, Rafael Ratto de, BOSCATO, Noéli, MACHADO, Fernanda Weingartner, BORGES, Fernanda Blos, CENCI, Maximiliano Sérgio, MORAES, Rafael Ratto de, BOSCATO, Noéli

Abstract

The bond strength of methacrylate (Z350, 3M ESPE) and silorane (P90, 3M ESPE) restorations, using different cavity filling techniques, was investigated. Cavities (6 × 3 × 3) in bovine teeth were filled using bulk, oblique, or horizontal increments. A push-out test was carried out after 24 h. Data were statistically analyzed (α = 5%). Methacrylate-based composites and the horizontal filling technique showed the highest bond strength values (10.2 ± 3.9, p < 0.05). Silorane-based composites showed no statistically significant differences regarding the filling techniques (p > 0.05).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Professor 2 14%
Librarian 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 50%
Psychology 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%