You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Modalities Used to Deliver Electronic Health Interventions for Chronic Pain: Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2196/11086 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian W Slattery, Stephanie Haugh, Laura O'Connor, Kady Francis, Christopher P Dwyer, Siobhán O'Higgins, Jonathan Egan, Brian E McGuire |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 4 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 206 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 19% |
| Unknown | 76 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 17% |
| Psychology | 23 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 84 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,375,494
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#2,724
of 7,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,753
of 343,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#70
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.