You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Autistic Disorder in Patients with Williams-Beuren Syndrome: A Reconsideration of the Williams-Beuren Syndrome Phenotype
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0030778 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sylvie Tordjman, George M. Anderson, Michel Botbol, Annick Toutain, Pierre Sarda, Michèle Carlier, Pascale Saugier-Veber, Clarisse Baumann, David Cohen, Céline Lagneaux, Anne-Claude Tabet, Alain Verloes |
| Abstract |
Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS), a rare developmental disorder caused by deletion of contiguous genes at 7q11.23, has been characterized by strengths in socialization (overfriendliness) and communication (excessive talkativeness). WBS has been often considered as the polar opposite behavioral phenotype to autism. Our objective was to better understand the range of phenotypic expression in WBS and the relationship between WBS and autistic disorder. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Chile | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 32 | 21% |
| Unknown | 27 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 31 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 34 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,736,847
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#48,778
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,556
of 169,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#645
of 3,562 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,562 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.