↓ Skip to main content

Alignment of the lower extremity mechanical axis by computer-aided design and application in total knee arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alignment of the lower extremity mechanical axis by computer-aided design and application in total knee arthroplasty
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11548-016-1382-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuan Z. Zhang, Sheng Lu, Hui Q. Zhang, Zhong M. Jin, Jian M. Zhao, Jian Huang, Zhi F. Zhang

Abstract

The success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) depends on many factors. The position of a prosthesis is vitally important. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the value of a computer-aided establishing lower extremity mechanical axis in TKA using digital technology. A total of 36 cases of patients with TKA were randomly divided into the computer-aided design of navigation template group (NT) and conventional intramedullary positioning group (CIP). Three-dimensional (3D) CT scanning images of the hip, knee, and ankle were obtained in NT group. X-ray images and CT scans were transferred into the 3D reconstruction software. A 3D bone model of the hip, knee, ankle, as well as the modified loading, was reconstructed and saved in a stereolithographic format. In the 3D reconstruction model, the mechanical axis of the lower limb was determined, and the navigational templates produced an accurate model using a rapid prototyping technique. The THA in CIP group was performed according to a routine operation. CT scans were performed postoperatively to evaluate the accuracy of the two TKA methods. The averaged operative time of the NT group procedures was [Formula: see text] min shorter than those of the conventional procedures ([Formula: see text]  min). The coronal femoral angle, coronal tibial angle, posterior tibial slope were [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] in NT group and [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] in CIP group, respectively. Statistically significant group differences were found. The navigation template produced through mechanical axis of lower extremity may provide a relative accurate and simple method for TKA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Other 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 21 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 39%
Engineering 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 25 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,317,110
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#667
of 847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,840
of 300,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#20
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 847 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.