↓ Skip to main content

The Strength and Timing of the Mitochondrial Bottleneck in Salmon Suggests a Conserved Mechanism in Vertebrates

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Strength and Timing of the Mitochondrial Bottleneck in Salmon Suggests a Conserved Mechanism in Vertebrates
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0020522
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonci N. Wolff, Daniel J. White, Michael Woodhams, Helen E. White, Neil J. Gemmell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 4%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,477,524
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,171
of 194,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,719
of 111,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#788
of 1,720 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,720 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.