↓ Skip to main content

Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Marketing Science, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 885)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
94 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
277 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
607 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments
Published in
Marketing Science, May 2020
DOI 10.1287/mksc.2018.1128
Authors

Romain Cadario, Pierre Chandon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 607 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 607 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 14%
Student > Master 79 13%
Student > Bachelor 62 10%
Researcher 51 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 5%
Other 80 13%
Unknown 220 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 88 14%
Psychology 55 9%
Social Sciences 44 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 42 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 4%
Other 111 18%
Unknown 243 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 181. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#225,720
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Marketing Science
#14
of 885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,651
of 412,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marketing Science
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them