↓ Skip to main content

Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Marketing Science, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 721)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
95 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
466 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments
Published in
Marketing Science, May 2020
DOI 10.1287/mksc.2018.1128
Authors

Romain Cadario, Pierre Chandon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 466 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 466 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 13%
Student > Bachelor 53 11%
Researcher 42 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 6%
Other 65 14%
Unknown 146 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 79 17%
Psychology 48 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 37 8%
Social Sciences 33 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 4%
Other 84 18%
Unknown 167 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#175,570
of 22,573,366 outputs
Outputs from Marketing Science
#10
of 721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,652
of 299,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marketing Science
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,573,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them