↓ Skip to main content

Buffered solutions versus 0.9% saline for resuscitation in critically ill adults and children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
172 tweeters
facebook
11 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Buffered solutions versus 0.9% saline for resuscitation in critically ill adults and children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012247.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alba M Antequera Martín, Jesus A Barea Mendoza, Alfonso Muriel, Ignacio Sáez, Mario Chico-Fernández, José M Estrada-Lorenzo, Maria N Plana

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 172 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 241 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Researcher 28 12%
Other 20 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 71 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 10%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Psychology 6 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 88 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2022.
All research outputs
#253,902
of 22,113,391 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#426
of 12,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,042
of 283,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,113,391 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.