↓ Skip to main content

Buffered solutions versus 0.9% saline for resuscitation in critically ill adults and children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
150 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Buffered solutions versus 0.9% saline for resuscitation in critically ill adults and children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012247.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alba M Antequera Martín, Jesus A Barea Mendoza, Alfonso Muriel, Ignacio Sáez, Mario Chico-Fernández, José M Estrada-Lorenzo, Maria N Plana

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 150 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Other 7 10%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 26 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2020.
All research outputs
#167,728
of 14,588,468 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#354
of 11,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,147
of 255,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,588,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.