↓ Skip to main content

A physical biomarker of the quality of cultured corneal endothelial cells and of the long-term prognosis of corneal restoration in patients

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Biomedical Engineering, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
A physical biomarker of the quality of cultured corneal endothelial cells and of the long-term prognosis of corneal restoration in patients
Published in
Nature Biomedical Engineering, July 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41551-019-0429-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akihisa Yamamoto, Hiroshi Tanaka, Munetoyo Toda, Chie Sotozono, Junji Hamuro, Shigeru Kinoshita, Morio Ueno, Motomu Tanaka

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Other 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 30%
Engineering 2 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2020.
All research outputs
#483,333
of 14,185,963 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biomedical Engineering
#168
of 473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,304
of 252,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biomedical Engineering
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,185,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 69.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.