You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A physical biomarker of the quality of cultured corneal endothelial cells and of the long-term prognosis of corneal restoration in patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biomedical Engineering, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41551-019-0429-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akihisa Yamamoto, Hiroshi Tanaka, Munetoyo Toda, Chie Sotozono, Junji Hamuro, Shigeru Kinoshita, Morio Ueno, Motomu Tanaka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 18% |
| Engineering | 5 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
#929,797
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biomedical Engineering
#436
of 963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,597
of 346,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biomedical Engineering
#13
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 89.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.