You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Standard Colonic Lavage Alters the Natural State of Mucosal-Associated Microbiota in the Human Colon
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0032545 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Harrell, Yunwei Wang, Dionysios Antonopoulos, Vincent Young, Lev Lichtenstein, Yong Huang, Stephen Hanauer, Eugene Chang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 153 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 31 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,055,188
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#24,926
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,328
of 170,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#353
of 3,544 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,544 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.