You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adaptive responses of animals to climate change are most likely insufficient
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-10924-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Viktoriia Radchuk, Thomas Reed, Céline Teplitsky, Martijn van de Pol, Anne Charmantier, Christopher Hassall, Peter Adamík, Frank Adriaensen, Markus P. Ahola, Peter Arcese, Jesús Miguel Avilés, Javier Balbontin, Karl S. Berg, Antoni Borras, Sarah Burthe, Jean Clobert, Nina Dehnhard, Florentino de Lope, André A. Dhondt, Niels J. Dingemanse, Hideyuki Doi, Tapio Eeva, Joerns Fickel, Iolanda Filella, Frode Fossøy, Anne E. Goodenough, Stephen J. G. Hall, Bengt Hansson, Michael Harris, Dennis Hasselquist, Thomas Hickler, Jasmin Joshi, Heather Kharouba, Juan Gabriel Martínez, Jean-Baptiste Mihoub, James A. Mills, Mercedes Molina-Morales, Arne Moksnes, Arpat Ozgul, Deseada Parejo, Philippe Pilard, Maud Poisbleau, Francois Rousset, Mark-Oliver Rödel, David Scott, Juan Carlos Senar, Constanti Stefanescu, Bård G. Stokke, Tamotsu Kusano, Maja Tarka, Corey E. Tarwater, Kirsten Thonicke, Jack Thorley, Andreas Wilting, Piotr Tryjanowski, Juha Merilä, Ben C. Sheldon, Anders Pape Møller, Erik Matthysen, Fredric Janzen, F. Stephen Dobson, Marcel E. Visser, Steven R. Beissinger, Alexandre Courtiol, Stephanie Kramer-Schadt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 433 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 45 | 10% |
| United States | 31 | 7% |
| Spain | 22 | 5% |
| Japan | 21 | 5% |
| France | 17 | 4% |
| Germany | 15 | 3% |
| Canada | 10 | 2% |
| Australia | 9 | 2% |
| Ireland | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 52 | 12% |
| Unknown | 204 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 309 | 71% |
| Scientists | 103 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 18 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 860 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 860 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 169 | 20% |
| Researcher | 137 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 105 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 104 | 12% |
| Other | 34 | 4% |
| Other | 103 | 12% |
| Unknown | 208 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 352 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 152 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 42 | 5% |
| Unknown | 247 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2212. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,901
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#68
of 58,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58
of 360,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#3
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.