Report for: Adaptive responses of animals to climate change are most likely insufficient

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Title	Adaptive responses of animals to climate change are most likely insufficient
Published in	Nature Communications, July 2019
DOI	10.1038/s41467-019-10924-4
Pubmed ID	31337752
Authors	Viktoriia Radchuk, Thomas Reed, Céline Teplitsky, Martijn van de Pol, Anne Charmantier, Christopher Hassall, Peter Adamík, Frank Adriaensen, Markus P. Ahola, Peter Arcese, Jesús Miguel Avilés, Javier Balbontin, Karl S. Berg, Antoni Borras, Sarah Burthe, Jean Clobert, Nina Dehnhard, Florentino de Lope, André A. Dhondt, Niels J. Dingemanse, Hideyuki Doi, Tapio Eeva, Joerns Fickel, Iolanda Filella, Frode Fossøy, Anne E. Goodenough, Stephen J. G. Hall, Bengt Hansson, Michael Harris, Dennis Hasselquist, Thomas Hickler, Jasmin Joshi, Heather Kharouba, Juan Gabriel Martínez, Jean-Baptiste Mihoub, James A. Mills, Mercedes Molina-Morales, Arne Moksnes, Arpat Ozgul, Deseada Parejo, Philippe Pilard, Maud Poisbleau, Francois Rousset, Mark-Oliver Rödel, David Scott, Juan Carlos Senar, Constanti Stefanescu, Bård G. Stokke, Tamotsu Kusano, Maja Tarka, Corey E. Tarwater, Kirsten Thonicke, Jack Thorley, Andreas Wilting, Piotr Tryjanowski, Juha Merilä, Ben C. Sheldon, Anders Pape Møller, Erik Matthysen, Fredric Janzen, F. Stephen Dobson, Marcel E. Visser, Steven R. Beissinger, Alexandre Courtiol, Stephanie Kramer-Schadt

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 440 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United Kingdom	48	11%
United States	33	8%
Japan	24	5%
Spain	24	5%
France	18	4%
Germany	16	4%
Canada	10	2%
Australia	8	2%
Ireland	6	1%
Other	55	13%
Unknown	198	45%

Demographic breakdown

Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	304	69%
Scientists	115	26%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	18	4%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	3	<1%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 788 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
Unknown	788	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Ph. D. Student	159	20%
Researcher	130	16%
Student > Bachelor	102	13%
Student > Master	101	13%
Student > Doctoral Student	29	4%
Other	104	13%
Unknown	163	21%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	334	42%
Environmental Science	148	19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology	39	5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences	15	2%
Social Sciences	10	1%
Other	42	5%
Unknown	200	25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.

All research outputs

#3,824

of 23,862,493 outputs

Outputs from Nature Communications

#61

of 49,886 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#64

of 347,793 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications

of 1,468 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 23,862,493 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 49,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 1,468 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

Adaptive responses of animals to climate change are most likely insufficient

About this Attention Score

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Twitter Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context