↓ Skip to main content

A Triple-Isotope Approach to Predict the Breeding Origins of European Bats

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Triple-Isotope Approach to Predict the Breeding Origins of European Bats
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030388
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana G. Popa-Lisseanu, Karin Sörgel, Anja Luckner, Leonard I. Wassenaar, Carlos Ibáñez, Stephanie Kramer-Schadt, Mateusz Ciechanowski, Tamás Görföl, Ivo Niermann, Grégory Beuneux, Robert W. Mysłajek, Javier Juste, Jocelyn Fonderflick, Detlev H. Kelm, Christian C. Voigt

Abstract

Despite a commitment by the European Union to protect its migratory bat populations, conservation efforts are hindered by a poor understanding of bat migratory strategies and connectivity between breeding and wintering grounds. Traditional methods like mark-recapture are ineffective to study broad-scale bat migratory patterns. Stable hydrogen isotopes (δD) have been proven useful in establishing spatial migratory connectivity of animal populations. Before applying this tool, the method was calibrated using bat samples of known origin. Here we established the potential of δD as a robust geographical tracer of breeding origins of European bats by measuring δD in hair of five sedentary bat species from 45 locations throughout Europe. The δD of bat hair strongly correlated with well-established spatial isotopic patterns in mean annual precipitation in Europe, and therefore was highly correlated with latitude. We calculated a linear mixed-effects model, with species as random effect, linking δD of bat hair to precipitation δD of the areas of hair growth. This model can be used to predict breeding origins of European migrating bats. We used δ(13)C and δ(15)N to discriminate among potential origins of bats, and found that these isotopes can be used as variables to further refine origin predictions. A triple-isotope approach could thereby pinpoint populations or subpopulations that have distinct origins. Our results further corroborated stable isotope analysis as a powerful method to delineate animal migrations in Europe.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Germany 2 1%
Switzerland 2 1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 153 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 20%
Researcher 32 19%
Student > Master 24 14%
Other 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 24 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 60%
Environmental Science 28 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Psychology 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 30 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,470
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,773
of 193,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,303
of 246,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,485
of 3,353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.